Friday, December 14, 2007

AKASH LEARNT how to use a pistol at home, the police said on Wednesday, a day after the 14-year-old allegedly fired four times from his father's gun to kill a classmate in a private Gurgaon school.
The class VIII student told the police that he had overheard his father talking to friends about the gun and how to use it, said Satheesh Ballan, deputy commissioner of police (south). "Moreover, since the foreign-made pistol was quite old and did not have an automatic locking system, it was easy to use and just required the pull of trigger to go off," he added.
The police have registered a case under arms act against Akash's father Azad Singh, a property dealer, for negligence in handling his pistol. The gun had been kept casually in a TV trolley and Akash had no problems in taking it out to school to kill Abhishek.
Akash and classmate Vikas, who allegedly shot one bullet from the same pistol, had a score to settle with Abhishek, who, they said, used to bully them.Ballan said the parents of both children were absconding. "We are trying to get the witnesses in the case to record their statement. We have recorded the statement of the principal Mamta Sharma only but the parents of the children who had probably witnessed the shooting are not letting them talk to the police," the DCP said.
The police have sealed the first-floor house of Akash in Islaampur. A woman, who identified herself as Akash's mother, told HT in phone that her son was innocent. She said Akash would not have gone to school on Tuesday as he had a bad cold. But Vikas called him repeatedly and insisted that he came. "Vikas also talked to me and requested me to send him to school as he had a very 'special task' with him to do," she said.
The claim could not be verified. Vikas's parents could not be reached.Both boys have been sent to the Observation Center in Faridabad and they would be tried under Juvenile Justice Act, the police said.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/071212/32/6odhp.html
नवाब मंसूर अली खान पटौदी ने भी तो अपनी लड़की फिल्म अभिनेत्री सोहा अली खान के नाम से बने आर्म्स लाइसेंस पर जो बंदूक थी से राज्य पशु काला हिरन मारा था. सरकार ने क्या जब उसके खिलाफ एक्शन लिया था नही न , क्यों ?
सोहा अली खान को क्या जरुरत पड़ी थी बंदूक लेने की , क्या वो रहती है वंहा जहा से लाइसेंस लिया, नही ना ।
सोचो दोस्तो .........................पुलिस अब भी एक्शन ले ले , उनका भला हो .

1 comment:

NARESH KADYAN said...

Animal activists seek CBI probe
Aditi Tandon
Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, June 8
While the Haryana Police is progressing at its own pace in the hunting case against MAK Pataudi, certain animal welfare organizations and activists have vowed to swing into action if the police attempts to distort facts and evidence.

Delhi-based Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) has in its possession a post mortem report of the female black buck, allegedly hunted down by Pataudi and his accomplices in Jhajjar five days ago. This report prepared under the aegis of the Central Zoo Authority, is separate from the one which the Haryana Police got conducted in Jhajjar after the incident. WTI officials say they will use this report after the police have filed charge sheets in the case.

“We want to see what evidence the police brings on record. If there are discrepancies, we will move in with our evidence,” Mr Ashok Kumar of the WTI told The Tribune today. Meanwhile, Bishnois in Haryana is highly perturbed over the incident and its serious fallout.

Hanuman Prasad Bishnoi, All-India President of the Akhil Bharatiya Jeevranksha Bishnoi Sabha, when contacted, said, “We will be satisfied if the arrests are made. If not, we will launch a massive campaign to ensure that the guilty are brought to book. We have also been told some portions of the black buck, like bones, have been hidden somewhere else. We are trying to find out where.”

Meanwhile, the People for Animals (PFA) has demanded a high level CBI probe into the alleged killing of the animals by Pataudi and his accomplices. The representation was sent today to the Prime Minister. Dr Sandeep Jain, a former member, Animal Welfare Board of India and Ludhiana PFA chairperson said, “The black buck was purposely buried to destroy evidence. When our activist Naresh Kadiyan exhumed the body and got an independent post-mortem examination done, he was booked by the police. The police role is dubious. Hence, the representation. We want the case to be taken away from state police.”Even SC Lawyer Raj Panjwani who has fought several cases against poachers said no case was made out against Kadiyan. “When the police buried the animal, it also surrendered its right over the animal. Legally speaking, Kadiyan’s action of exhuming the animal was not criminal.”

On the subject of Haryana police’s role in the case, a highly placed Haryana Forest Department officer went to the extent of saying that the poaching case against Pataudi and six others needed no further evidence for prosecution of the accused. “The accused were caught red handed with search lights, guns, carcasses. One of them has a past record in hunting. What more does the police need?”